Dishin’ It Out Again
20 August 2010
After having had a basically unproductive week, I decided today to blow it all to smithereens and do something my beloved Grandma Kate referred to as goin’ bummin’. I got in Red Rocket and I headed out.
One of my haunts has been an antique mall that is fairly nearby, so after I hit the art supply house (the high priced one, not the one with the discounts and coupons) for some PVA glue, RR and I zipped down the road. I actually had one thing I wanted to find. A handkerchief. Anything after that would be great fun, but not a necessity. This item was for a friend.
Here is what I like about those places. You get to see the stuff you grew up with. You also get to see a lot of neat things that people used to use. Then there are the beautiful things that graced someone’s home until the estate sale. I like history a lot, so wandering through one of those places is just plain fun.
Recently I have been stopping by the vintage clothing booths. It’s great to try on hats, furs, and even old shoes. I saw an evening gown today that had to have been a size 2. It was classic 1950s, navy blue and simply beautiful. I could see a young Jackie Bouvier in it.
My other weakness is old linens. I do needlework, and Grandma did it, so I truly do appreciate the lovely things people made even lovelier by embroidery, or a little crochet around the edges. The printed tablecloths from the 1930s - 1950s are also attention getters. They are often so bright and cheery that I can imagine them in my aunt’s kitchen with its southern window and red Formica countertops.
I had an armload of goodies when I spied a cache of Wedgwood. I don’t know how I missed it because I had wandered through that booth, admiring all the vintage cocktail glasses. I scored three reasonably priced bread and butter plates, one decent cream soup set, and four other bowls that are pretty ratty. Four underplates are just fine. The ratty bowls, however, are just about as ratty as the rest of the set. (It lived through hard times with my dad’s various women friends washing dishes under the influence!)
When I hauled that set home from Illinois, I swore I wasn’t going to add to it, but four plates weren’t enough, so I brought it back up to the original eight. I recently discovered that two of the six remaining cereal bowls were actually broken and glued together. As I pondered the problem, I realized I’d really rather have rimmed soups, or even more nifty, cream soups. The other missing items were bread and butter plates. Mom never seemed to want them, so we didn’t buy them when I conned Dad into giving her the set. I, however, find them very handy for dessert and a spot of tea.
This grand find came at the end of a revelation of sorts. It dawned on me the other day that when we talked about reviving the old dinner group, I really wasn’t interested in another group of ten people. I rather enjoyed having six for dinner last weekend. It didn’t involve the table leaves and it was less crowded in our small dining room.
Obviously, from a dish freak’s standpoint, it also afforded me a larger selection of tableware! I only have three sets that will serve twelve, and one is for Christmas. The smaller group meant I could use Mom’s Wedgwood, and that was a nice change as no one present had ever seen it.
Friends have a great time teasing me about my dishes, but there are worse things I could be collecting. How about Jim Beam bottles or shot glasses? At least they get to enjoy what goes on the plates! I have Anna’s Rosenthal in the basement and it’s killing me. Oh, my but what an elegant 1950s table I could set with that collection! There are even egg cups! My job, though, is to guard it carefully, watch eBay to see if it’s value ever rises, and dispose of it as she dictates. People are collecting “mid-century” stuff these days, so I do look for its value to increase. Raymond Loewy designed the shape of the set, but Rosenthal used their own design on it, which means it will never fetch what a set with his name on it would.
That’s one of the interesting things about china. My wedding china is through the roof in value and it’s my least favorite set. Who knew?! I lack four large rimmed soups or it would be complete in just about every way. Sadly, they never made fruit saucers in it. (There were cream soups, though!) It was a Williamsburg reproduction pattern and I chose it because I figured it would be around forever. Who would ever guess that Colonial Williamsburg and Wedgwood would have a falling out? At the time, it was unthinkable. Of course, Wedgwood filing for bankruptcy protection was equally unfathomable!
If I had known then what I know now, I would have just picked what I wanted in the first place! But my parental unit was going to England and he loved buying English china. I picked English china. Oh, don’t misunderstand…I adore English china! But there was a set of Ceralene that caught my eye, and then there was a white porcelain set I loved, and then there was the Richard Ginori set….
I hope we do revive the dinner group, but I’m going to lobby hard for a smaller number this time. I want to be able to use everything I own because there is no point in having it if you don’t trot it out. There are at least four more sets they’ve never seen!
And on that note, I need to go update my inventory book!