24 April 2008
There are friends for whom one will unquestioningly go to the mat. And the terms of such an unconditional arrangement also mean that one is also allowed to bring them to task when they deserve it. A friend forgot that yesterday was Administrative Professionals’ Day. He forgot to A) take her to lunch, or B) send her flowers, or C) leave her a little gift bag with a gift card for a massage, pedicure, you name it. Her method of bringing this to his attention was great and I have to hand it to her (I was there, you see-), her timing was excellent. His intern and I jumped on him with claws out! If he doesn’t do something for her today, I think I might have to go back out there and hurt him.
I might excuse him given the extenuating circumstances, but he’s a big boy and he oughta keep track of that kind of stuff. And now about those extenuating circumstances…
We went to school yesterday to get a new educational plan in place for his disabled daughter. The administrator in charge of the meeting was not the kind of person I’d invite out for a cup of coffee. I’ve participated in my share of these meetings, so I know the drill. But, as my own professional judgment was denigrated and I was insulted by the man, I did what I can do in those meetings – I bit my tongue. (Most of my friends still don’t believe I could sit through a faculty meeting without saying a word, but as goddess is my witness, it’s the only way to get a meeting over with!) In this case, the man was offering up ideas that had already seen better days and hadn’t worked before.
I observed the teachers and I could well imagine what they were thinking. I knew we were on the same page, but this guy wasn’t even in the same book.
I watched my dear friend lose it as he described what would happen if his child did not have the skills necessary to allow her to be independent. I watched his child lose it when the reality of her situation sank in. It broke my heart. When he seemed to capitulate, I got nervous. But, as I later reflected, this is someone who avoids confrontation. (His daddy and I discussed this one summer afternoon many years ago -) He needed me to be the backbone for all three of us, but I was in a tenuous position. I wanted what I wanted, but to say what I was thinking might have lost not just the battle, but the whole war. Sometimes you have to pick your battles –
To be sure, I was vocal about the need for a reading specialist, but the part I really, really wanted to say was this, dear readers –
Listen up, you little worm! You have had this child in your system for thirteen years and you couldn’t manage to teach her to read. The idea of recycling an old special ed reading program that is designed for elementary kids is ludicrous, but since you don’t employ reading specialists in this division, then I can kind of forgive your blatant ignorance of the value of a reading professional with the kind of network I bring to this situation.
The fact is, fella, you have no idea what magic someone with my qualifications can make with a child who has never known success with reading. That I have done this for over 22 years, and with a success rate you could only hope for, is reason enough to listen to me. You think that by sending her back to the high school to go over the same old tired stuff that she’s going to make progress. The truth is she’ll just be spinning her wheels, all over again. Whereas, I, or one of my ilk, will not only have her leaving rubber on the pavement, but popping wheelies in the process.
You wanna compare my excellent and painstaking analysis of her reading skills and knowledge of words to the Woodcock Johnson or any other “thumbnail” achievement test? Go ahead.
But realize you’ve thrown down the gauntlet and I now challenge you to take my work to my hardest critic, my mentor. Let him review what I’ve done. He, too, has his degree in school psychology and he knows, probably better than you, what the score is – no pun intended. If I have muffed up, or used an inferior assessment instrument, he’ll be the first to say so. But I am so confident of my work that I can willingly invite you to participate in this little experiment.
And afterward, when the man tells you letting me work with her is not only more cost-effective for your school system, but that her achievement will be tended to by someone who cares deeply about this young woman and who will not let her down, you get to kiss my ring.
Her teachers have taken her as far as they are capable of taking her. They are good teachers and they are conscientious educators. They don’t like your ideas, either. But, bless their hearts, they need that paycheck, so they aren’t going to buck the system.
The bottom line is this: you can dream up all sorts of excuses, but you cannot take away my experience and my skills. You cannot say to this young woman, “Darlin’, don’t fret. Together we will make this happen. Trust me. I will not let you fall into the abyss of abject ignorance.” You cannot because you’ve already failed her and my assessment was the black and white proof. Luckily, my man, you are only the acting administrator. Let us hope your superior can exercise better judgment and teach you a thing or two about how not to conduct a meeting with a parent, student and consulting professional.
Ranting aside, it’s a sad day when the regulations that were designed to protect the children are used against them, and for a school division’s bottom line. In this instance we see a very bad case of penny-wise, pound-foolishness. I swear to goddess. In all my years in the Star City’s school division, I never saw this kind of thing. I just wish the real estate agents who push certain parts of the valley for the “excellent” schools could catch on to this.