15 April 2008
Happy Birthday to Uncle Bunkie and that stellar musician, Roger Bellow!
This morning’s Roanoke Times gave City Council another lecture on their failure to involve public comment and input into their decision to award a contract for an amphitheater. The paper pointed out that not only did they fail to deliver on their promise to involve the public, but that they had failed to award a contract to a developer who was putting its own money into the project.
At the Friday night panel discussion, Council Member Mason was asked the following:
“The Roanoke Times has been pointed in its criticism of Council’s just barely legal methods of discussing business outside of the Council Chambers. What are you personally doing to improve this situation?”
Let us examine the question first. The person who submitted it was taking for granted that Ms. Mason was doing something to change things. Obviously she figured as a woman, Ms. Mason was likely to be more sensitive to the will of the public and the criticism of the fourth estate. Notice also that the question acknowledged that the discussions were legal – barely, but legal. (I have no doubt they have Mr. Hackworth to thank for that. He’s a diligent kind of guy.)
Now let me relate that Ms. Mason was the consummate politician in her response. She did not refer to the strings of telephone calls that routinely take place to insure a council majority, nor did she refer to the emails that just skirt the legality of the situation. Rather, she credited Mr. Hackworth for seeing to it that they went into executive session for matters such as personnel decisions and to discuss contracts so that they could maintain the upper hand in negotiations and get the taxpayers the best deals possible.
What’s wrong with this answer and why were the cynics in the group so well rewarded?
For one thing, it’s clear she’s playing on a Little League team where the boys set the rules and she’s going along with them. For another, she knew good and well that the paper was saying Council wasn’t involving the public in the process of deciding how money should or should not be spent. Council was not allowing the public the opportunity to weigh in on the site for the amphitheater, and that these exclusionary tactics are likely to unseat the current mayor and jeopardize the anointed candidates to Council.
Earlier in the week I had made my decision, somewhat reluctantly, to support former mayor David Bowers in his campaign to return as the Star City’s mayor. Reluctant only because he’s backed the wrong horses a few times. But then another thing happened that got my attention.
I was patronized by City Manager Darlene Burcham, as were all the other people present at the business meeting of the AAUW of VA convention. She spoke to us “as a woman balancing career and family,” She never in a million years would have given that kind of namby-pamby baloney to a group of businessmen visiting our community. I know she thought she was sticking to our theme of the balancing act, but it was so patronizing that I wanted to stand up and say, “What the hell do you mean your grandkids are allowed to barge in on official meetings? What kind of business are you running down there on my nickel? We don’t pay you to play grandma on the city’s time! You’d fire a city employee for doing that and don’t say you wouldn’t! The entire city knows how you run city hall!”
That did it. I shot off an email to Mr. Bowers, reminded him of my loyalty in the past, and gave him permission to plant one of his bright yellow signs in my yard, along with a few admonishments. (Old school teachers always do that kind of thing.)
I want progress on City Council, but I also want public input into the projects that are going to cost the taxpayers. I want the city to be cost-efficient, but I also want our residents to have the services they deserve. The amphitheater is window dressing. We already have the Jefferson Center, the Civic Center and the high school stadiums for venues. We need better bus routes, we need services closer to the VA for our homeless veterans, and we need economic development.
My one caution to Mr. Bowers is this: do not align yourself with that other guy seeking to retain his seat on council. As a city teacher, I was bitten by that snake on more than one occasion. If I have to bring you an entire contingent of teachers and past school board members who know the truth about him, I will. Pay attention, Mr. Bowers. Do your homework and you’ll soon be cutting ribbons again.